I have a rather complicated idea of non-traditional
schools. In concept, they sound very
cool. It seems as though non-traditional
schools are an effective means of teaching beyond the normal curriculum. However, it seems as though the model for
non-traditional schools is not yet ready to be implemented. The organization that is necessary to run an
effective school just isn’t there. On
top of that, it seems as though almost all of these non-traditional schools
focus almost entirely on science. This
means there is vital information in other content areas that the students are
missing out on.
There
is another key piece of the Harpswell School that I have an issue with. This goes beyond my educational philosophy,
but I don’t think that it is a positive that there is no custodial staff or
kitchen staff. The unemployment rates in
our country are at record highs, and schools like this are making them
worse. This would also have a negative
effect in the classroom. This takes vital
time away from education planning.
All
around, I would say the presentation was a decent representation of the
paper. The only inconsistency I found
was the difference between how the different philosophies treat the
non-traditional school model. There was
no real mention of the different philosophical school of thought during the
presentation. Despite this fact, I think
this group did a fantastic job creating a case study of the Harpswell School.
No comments:
Post a Comment