Essentialism: Essentialists believe that individuals in a
society should have a common core of information, and schools should be focused
on teaching this common core.
Perennialism: Perennialism suggests that there are a few
long-lasting ideas that always remain true and need to be taught.
Behaviorism: This idea states that behaviors define people
and every behavior should be seen as a response to stimuli.
Positivism: Positivism suggests that truth and knowledge
should be limited to things that can be observed with senses.
Progressivism: Progressivists think that ideas should be
tested using experiments, and that learning is apparent in the questions asked
by the students.
Humanism: Humanists believe that all humans are born good
and later become enslaved by institutions (similar to Rousseau’s views on
government).
Constructivism: Constructivists focus on hands-on learning
and allowing students to develop their own frames of thought.
Reconstructionism: Reconstructionism is aimed mainly at
setting a curriculum that is meant to make social reforms.
As much
as I hate to admit it, my dominant philosophy is Essentialist. I would love to spend all day going on
tangents to describe my favorite ideas and times in history, but I also realize
there are certain things that every student needs to learn. I know I cringe every time a student doesn’t
know something that seems like basic information (how to find slope, Pearl
Harbor attack).
On the
other end, I can say that Behaviorism is as far away from my perspective as
possible. This whole idea that students’
actions can be diagnosed as being caused by a specific stimulus assumes that
all students think alike. At the same
time, this idea suggests that there is nothing beyond students’ actions. That means that every student who isn’t speaking
in class aren’t paying attention. As
someone who is usually the student who isn’t speaking, I can say this is not
true.